USPTO serial 75346213
SKY ROCKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKY ROCKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S GOLDENBERG
DAVID S GOLDENBERG FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1699UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceuticals, namely, orally-ingested stimulants for inducing wakefulness or alertness | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | cereal based snack foods; herbs and seasonings; non-alcoholic coffee based beverages, dry mixes for making non-alcoholic coffee based beverages and non-alcoholic tea based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | light beverages, namely, carbonated and non-carbonated drinking waters and flavored drinking waters; soft drinks; fruit juices; concentrates for making soft drinks and syrups and concentrates for making fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by XTZ Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by XTZ Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SKY ROCKET
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |