USPTO serial 75355939
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD J KESSLER
EDWARD J KESSLER STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC1100 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3934UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | custom manufacture of medical diagnostic devices | ACTIVE | May 6, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |