USPTO serial 75364384
NETSAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2715903Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NETSAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WESTMINSTER, CO
WESTMINSTER, CO
GOLDEN, CO
GOLDEN, CO
Golden, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S LESLIE MISROCK
S LESLIE MISROCK PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed matter, namely, brochures, books, printed instructional and educational teaching materials for use in connection with computer software providing an intermediary interface which enables the user to interact with software applications, personalizing to the characteristics of the user, and adapting to a history of the user's interactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1997 |
| 041 | Media production services for animation, graphics video, recorded voice and written text | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1997 |
| 042 | Computer software design and development services for design and development of computer software providing an intermediary interface which enables the user to interact with software applications, personalizing to the characteristics of the user, and adapting to a history of the user's interactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FINALI CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FINALI CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NETSAGE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NETSAGE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AGENT BASED CURRICULA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NETSAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |