Drawing for VTEC

USPTO serial 75365109

VTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID R HAARZ

DAVID R HAARZ DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1901 L ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer system comprising of computer hardware, computer peripherals and computer software, namely, a computer program for use in generating two, three, and four dimensional representations of structures for use in facilitating the modeling of material handling systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 23, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 23, 2002OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 16, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance