USPTO serial 75368378
LOVESTORIES.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2424146Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2001
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOVESTORIES.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA
Broken Arrow, OK
Broken Arrow, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven W. Brennan
Steven W. Brennan St. John, Wallace, Brennan & Folan LLP21515 Hawthorne BoulevardSuite 1120Torrance, CA 90503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing an interactive web site featuring a wide variety of entertainment information namely, poems, stories, viewpoints, articles, links to other sites, message boards, newsletters, diaries, and virtual postcards related to love and romance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 4, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 21, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |