Drawing for HOLLYWOOD @ HOME

USPTO serial 75368527

HOLLYWOOD @ HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLLYWOOD @ HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HENRY KLEIN

HENRY KLEIN LADAS & PARRY LAW OFFICE5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5679UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009"Audio equipment, audio electronic products, namely, receivers, radios, cassette players, amplifiers, CD players, digital audio tape players, equalizers, speakers, crossovers, tape players, mobile phones, navigational equipment, radar detectors, and security alarmsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 24, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 25, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 24, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 6, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance