USPTO serial 75369284
SEALY POSTUREPEDIC CROWN JEWEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2002
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEALY POSTUREPEDIC CROWN JEWEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TRINITY, NC
TRINITY, NC
Ohio Mattress Company Licensing and Components Group, The
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Ohio Mattress Company Licensing and Components Group, The
Ohio Mattress Company Licensing and Components Group, The
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Ohio Mattress Company Licensing and Components Group, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randel S. Springer
Randel S. Springer Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLCOne West Fourth StreetWinston-Salem, NC 27101UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SEALY TECHNOLOGY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SEALY TECHNOLOGY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ohio Mattress Company Licensing and Components Group, The
- Other trademarks owned by Ohio Mattress Company Licensing and Components Group, The
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named SEALY POSTUREPEDIC CROWN JEWEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |