USPTO serial 75369322
RONDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CADY, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RONDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hailo-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
D-35702 Haiger-Flarnmersbach, DE
Other trademarks owned by Hailo-Werk Rudolf Loh GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN D ERICKSON
KEVIN D ERICKSON SPECKMAN PAULEY & FEJER PC2800 W HIGGINS RD STE 365HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60195UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Small hand-operated domestic and kitchen appliances (not of noble metal or plated), and furniture of metal, plastics and wood, namely kitchen chairs, iron tables, kitchen tables, clothes racks, waste collectors, kitchen carrousel; kitchen lights, electrical towel-drying appliances, domestic ladders of metal; stop-up stools, folding stepladders, ironing table coverings, and wall containers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |