USPTO serial 75369375
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
NEW YORK, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nate A. Garhart
Karen S. Frank Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass LLPOne Montgomery Street, Suite 3000San Francisco, CA 94104UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | FURNITURE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2020 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 6, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |