USPTO serial 75369441
DATASELECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATASELECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J KERA
DAVID J KERA OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EQUIPMENT FOR DELIVERING AND MANAGING THE DELIVERY OF VOICE, VIDEO, AND DATA SIGNALS OVER HYBRID FIBER/COAXIAL TWO-WAY NETWORKS - NAMELY, FIBER OPTIC TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, AMPLITUDE MODULATION FIBER NODES, MODEMS, RADIO FREQUENCY AMPLIFIERS, CIRCUIT BOARDS, AND MICROPROCESSORS WITH EMBEDDED SOFTWARE RELATING TO NETWORK MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, INCLUDING DEPLOYMENT AND ACTIVATION, OF HYBRID FIBER/COAXIAL TWO-WAY NETWORKS FOR TRANSMITTING VOICE, VIDEO AND DATA SIGNALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGNING, FOR OTHERS, HYBRID FIBER/COAXIAL TWO-WAY NETWORKS FOR TRANSMITTING VOICE, VIDEO AND DATA SIGNALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |