USPTO serial 75370030
DYNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2015 Commonwealth of Australia, AU
2015 Commonwealth of Australia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H T KANE
DAVID H T KANE KANE DALSIMER SULLIVAN KURUCZ LEVY ET AL711 3RD AVE 20TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digitally operable building sensor system comprised of passive IR motion sensing detectors, IR remote control transceivers, motion sensing detectors for use throughout buildings, electronic security systems comprised of computer hardware, video monitors, keypads, operating computer software, electronic switches for detecting motion and electronic motion detectors, and parts therefor; apparatus for controlling domestic, commercial and industrial lighting systems, namely, electric lighting controls and electromechanical controls for use in operating lighting; apparatus for controlling the occurrence and level of lighting in a building or the like, namely, remote controls for use with lighting, computer controls for remotely controlling lighting; automated lighting time clock and lighting event controllers, namely, timing sensors and electromechanical and electric controls for controlling the use of lighting as determined by specific events; apparatus for programming and automatically setting the required lighting levels of lights in a building or the like at predetermined times during a predetermined period and apparatus for overriding the same, namely, computer hardware, computer keypads and operating computer software; automated lighting energy management system and apparatus comprised of computer hardware and operating computer software; automated lighting event controlled security system comprised of motion sensors, computer hardware and operating computer software | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2002 |
| 011 | apparatus for lighting, namely, electric lighting fixtures, and electric track lighting units; apparatus for lighting a desired part of a building or the like in response to sensed motion, namely, lighting fixtures with motion sensors | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |