USPTO serial 75370112
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PRODUCCIONES INFOVISION, S.A. DE C.V.
Col. Lomas de Chapultepec, MX
Other trademarks owned by PRODUCCIONES INFOVISION, S.A. DE C.V.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILLIP N ISLIP
PHILLIP N ISLIP BAKER & MCKENZIE4500 TRAMMEL CROW CTR2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | astringent mouthwash or rinse to quit smoking, which avoids bad breath and fights tobacco consumption; beauty products such as, cosmetic gels to shape the body, reductive soaps, body shaping creams, creams and gels to reduce cellulitis, creams and gels to reduce strias, essential oils for personal use, anti age creams and gels, anti-itching creams, hydrating and nourishing creams for body and hands, beauty masks, cosmetic preparations for the thinness, cosmetic goods such as lipsticks, blush, mascara, shadows, eyeliners and lip liners, make-up bases, compact and liquid make-ups, makeup powders, nail enamels, nail conditioners, nail hardeners, nail polishers, nail creams and oils, deodorants; body and hair shampoos and perfumes, body powder | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |