Drawing for SATURN INFORMATION SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75370139

SATURN INFORMATION SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATURN INFORMATION SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STANLEY H COHEN

CAESAR RIVISE BERNSTEIN COHEN & POKOTILOW LTD7 PENN CTR 12TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 10103-2212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT ASSISTS ANESTHESIOLOGY IN THE RECORDING AND REPORTING OF ANESTHESIA RELATED DATAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 31, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 8, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 27, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 2, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance