Drawing for NEWS CHANNEL 9

USPTO serial 75370316

NEWS CHANNEL 9

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEWS CHANNEL 9?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN G LINIHAN

MARTIN G LINIHAN HODGSON RUSS ANDREWS WOODS GOODYEAR1800 1 M & T PLZBUFFALO, NY 14203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041television program servicesACTIVEAug 15, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 13, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 3, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 22, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 12, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance