USPTO serial 75370365
VIRTUAL WARRIOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL WARRIOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Swindon SN2 6YP, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN V MORIARTY
JOHN V MORIARTY WOODWARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON ETCBANK ONE CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and electronic apparatus for playing electronic games, computer game programs, computer game software, computer game compact discs, video game cartridges, video game discs, hand held electrical units for playing electronic games and electronic personal organisers | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games, toys and playthings, electronic games, toys and playthings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |