USPTO serial 75370531
SUNMAXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2824210Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUNMAXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-8006 ZURICH, CH
CH-8006 ZURICH, CH
CH-8006 ZURICH, CH
D-50259 Pulheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, SUN AND TANNING CREAMS AND LOTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | APPARATUS FOR TANNING, TANNING ALL AROUND, AND COIN-OPERATED SUN-TANNING APPARATUS, NAMELY, SOLARIA, SUN LAMPS, SUN-TANNING BEDS, AND PARTS THEREFOR; AND ULTRAVIOLET BULBS NOT FOR MEDICAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTATION, BUSINESS CONSULTING, AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FOR OTHERS, ALL OF THE FOREGOING IN THE FIELD OF SUN-TANNING STUDIO OPERATIONS; PROVIDING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO OTHERS IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF SUN-TANNING STUDIOS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUNMAXX AG
- Other trademarks owned by SUNMAXX AG
- Other trademarks owned by SUNMAXX AG
- Other trademarks owned by UVA-Solar Wolfgang Muller KG
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SUNMAXX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |