Drawing for "DESTINATION 500"

USPTO serial 75370766

"DESTINATION 500"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUTHEY, LYNN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with "DESTINATION 500"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KATHLEEN HOOVER

KATHLEEN HOOVER RT 5 BOX 592AKEMP, TX 75143UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028BOARD GAMEACTIVEMay 20, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2001PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 4, 2001PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 15, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance