CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CULTIVA

USPTO serial 75371154

CULTIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2580539Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 18, 2002
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CULTIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R.J. Heher, Esq.

R J HEHER ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPEMBARCADERO CTR W275 BATTERY STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, namely display modules, processing modules, yield monitors and global positioning system modules; computer software designed to assist the user in utilizing the global positioning system technology and the guidance of the user's equipment, namely, tractors and spraying rigs used in farming; computer software utilizing geographic information systems for guiding farm and industrial equipment; electronic rate controllers for optimizing the distribution of agricultural products; antennasSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
035Data processing services for others; franchising, namely, offering technical assistance to others in the operation of a business involving the distribution and sale of the above-noted wares and supply of the data processing services to othersSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2009C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Nov 16, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 30, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 28, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Nov 13, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance