Drawing for ADVANCED ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 75371204

ADVANCED ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ADVANCED ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Distributorship services in the nature of a reseller of computer software of othersACTIVEFeb 20, 1996
041Training in the use of engineering computer softwareACTIVEFeb 20, 1996
042Engineering, and Engineering consulting services, and Providing assistance to software usersACTIVEFeb 20, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 4, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 4, 2000OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 12, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance