USPTO serial 75371312
SUBTECHNIQUE, INC. VIDEO, TELE-ROBOTICS, AND MACHINE VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUBTECHNIQUE, INC. VIDEO, TELE-ROBOTICS, AND MACHINE VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video, tele-robotics and machine vision products, namely, video cameras, lens controllers, night vision intensifier controllers, relay optics, underwater camera enclosures, fiber optic light sources, duct and pipeline inspection units, remotely piloted vehicle (RPV) and robotic vision systems consisting principally of vision sensors, signal processors and computer and manual controllers, video inspection units and computer software for use in communicating with and controlling video and vision devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | telephone and computerized, on-line ordering services in the field of industrial video, digital photography, CCTV and machine vision products, namely, cabling, CCTV systems, character generators, digital cameras, distribution amplifiers, environmental enclosures, infrared illuminators, infrared cameras, intensified night vision cameras, LCD flat panel displays, lenses, lights, line scan cameras, microphones, computer monitors, motion detectors, pan and tilt heads, PCMCIA peripherals, PCMCIA readers, printers, rack mounts, remote video controllers, resolution charts, scan converters, surge protectors, switchers, time/date generators, tripods, underwater enclosures, VCRs, video cameras, video overlays, weatherproof enclosures and wireless video transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Machine vision engineering and computer programming for others; design and integration consultation in the fields of robotics, factory automation, video surveillance and CCTV systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Subtechnique, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SUBTECHNIQUE, INC. VIDEO, TELE-ROBOTICS, AND MACHINE VISION
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |