USPTO serial 75371661
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
32339 Espelkamp, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Capone
John Capone GTECH, Corporate Headquater10 Memorial BlvdProvidence, RI 02903UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Coin-operated gambling machines, namely, slot machines, video slot machines, video gaming machines, electronic card and poker machines, electronic backgammon; casino apparatuses, namely, computers and computer programs that account for gambling wagers, computer programs for use in a gambling environment to improve communication; casino video slot machine accounting software | ACTIVE | Sep 13, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |