USPTO serial 75371915
NITRO AWESOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NITRO AWESOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A ARRETT
NICKOLAS E WESTMAN WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLYSTE 1600 900 SECOND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3319UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Tanning products, namely, self-tanning lotions, sun tan oil, sun tan gel and sun tan lotion | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 4, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |