USPTO serial 75372117
SCIENTIFIC LEARNING CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCIENTIFIC LEARNING CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHRYN M WHEBLE
KATHRYN M WHEBLE COOLEY GODWARD LLP1 MARITIME PLZ 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical devices for the treatment of tinnitus, schizophrenia, depression and repetitive stress injuries, consisting of a computer, keyboard, computer mouse, joystick, speakers, headphones, soundcard, platform or grid consisting of fixed or movable pegs, buttons, pressure sensors, letters or designs that create and measure the user's response to sensory stimuli and electronically transmit the user's response to a computer, a cylinder containing a peg that raises up and down and records the user's ability to maintain contact with the peg and electronically transmits the user's response to a computer, computer software for creating sensory stimuli and recording and analyzing the user's response to sensory stimuli | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Scientific Learning Corporation,
- Other trademarks owned by Scientific Learning Corporation,
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named SCIENTIFIC LEARNING CORPORATION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |