USPTO serial 75372302
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
COLMAR, PA
COLMAR, PA
SEVERN TRENT WATER PURIFICATION, INC.
COLMAR, PA
Other trademarks owned by SEVERN TRENT WATER PURIFICATION, INC.
The Woodlands, TX
The Woodlands, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JO KATHERINE D'AMBROSIO
Usha Menon D'Ambrosio & Menon, LLP2825 Wilcrest DriveSuite 486Houston, TX 77042CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |