Drawing for DIRECT CONNECT

USPTO serial 75372369

DIRECT CONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIRECT CONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Grow

MICHAEL A GROW ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038non-cellular and non-operated assisted conference call services, electronic mail services, and facsimile receipt and transmittal services offered exclusively to Applicant's bank credit card customersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 28, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 28, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 13, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 9, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 25, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance