Drawing for PERSONAL ASSISTANT TELEPHONE INTERFACE

USPTO serial 75372566

PERSONAL ASSISTANT TELEPHONE INTERFACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERSONAL ASSISTANT TELEPHONE INTERFACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK J YOUNG

MARK J YOUNG DRAUGHON PA200 W FORSYTH ST STE 1730JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Telecommunications consulting and support services, telephone answering services, namely receiving, receipt notification, broadcasting, message transcription, and narration of voice messagesACTIVESep 5, 1997
038Electronic voice messaging, namely, the broadcasting and subsequent transmission of voice messagesACTIVESep 5, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 7, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance