Drawing for BUSTLINE GYM

USPTO serial 75372651

BUSTLINE GYM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUSTLINE GYM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew A. Pater

MATTHEW A PATER SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN LLP3000 K ST NWSTE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5116

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Exercise equipment, namely, machines for exercising the pectoral, upper arms, and upper back musclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 15, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 15, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 16, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 24, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance