USPTO serial 75372651
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew A. Pater
MATTHEW A PATER SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN LLP3000 K ST NWSTE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5116| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Exercise equipment, namely, machines for exercising the pectoral, upper arms, and upper back muscles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |