Drawing for BMC THE BAD MOVIE CHANNEL

USPTO serial 75372696

BMC THE BAD MOVIE CHANNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BILLINGS, JESSIE W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BMC THE BAD MOVIE CHANNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRADLEY J. GROSS

BRADLEY J GROSS BECKER & POLIAKOFF, PA3111 STIRLING RDFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33312UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES, LASER DISCS AND MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT AND SPORTING EVENTSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, GOLF SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEAT SUITS, SWEATERS, BOXER SHORTS, AND CAPSACTIVE—
038CABLE TELEVISION AND VIDEO BROADCASTING SERVICESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, VIDEOTAPE AND MOTION PICTURE FILM PRODUCTION SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Oct 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 12, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 20, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 25, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 20, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 7, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 10, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance