Drawing for MERCURY

USPTO serial 75372979

MERCURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERCURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANCINE M. HANSON

FRANCINE M HANSON COOLEY GODWARD LLP1 MARITIME PLZ FL 20SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3510UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009REPROGRAMMABLE COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY LOGIC EMULATORS, USED FOR RAPID PROTOTYPING, VERIFYING INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY, AND CONCURRENT DESIGN OF SYSTEM LEVEL COMPONENTSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 1998LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jul 28, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance