Drawing for BELGIAN MUMS

USPTO serial 75372993

BELGIAN MUMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2282238Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 28, 1999
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BELGIAN MUMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031LIVE PLANTS; NAMELY, PLANTS OF CHRYSANTHEMUM VARIETIES BRED IN BELGIUMEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 20, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2011TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
May 1, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 14, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 30, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Oct 30, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 7, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 19, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 20058.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Oct 12, 2005ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 1999R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 23, 1999CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 12, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 1998IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
May 13, 1998IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
May 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance