USPTO serial 75372993
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | LIVE PLANTS; NAMELY, PLANTS OF CHRYSANTHEMUM VARIETIES BRED IN BELGIUM | EXPIRED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1998 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 1998 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |