USPTO serial 75373229
THE FAB 5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FAB 5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Simmons-Gill
221 N LASALLE STSTE 850CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Webber, Mayce Edward Christopher
- Other trademarks owned by Webber, Mayce Edward Christopher
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE FAB 5
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 8, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |