USPTO serial 75373437
SYSTEMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3534396Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SYSTEMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Port Washington, NY
Port Washington, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Sarney
Michael F. Sarney Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP1407 Broadway39th FloorNew York, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer monitors, each of which is used by a single computer; specifically excluded are the following; wire, cables, cords, connectors, wire patch cords, jacks, adaptors used to connect a computer to another computer or that are part of any computer network (whether or not any such cable, cord, wire patch connector, adaptor or other such device contains a microprocessor or any memory), including electrical wire for use in the telecommunications industry, fiber optic wire, cords and cables; telecommunications adaptors; fiber optic interconnection cables; telecommunications adaptors; telecommunications connectors, plugs, jacks and connecting blocks; telecommunications devices that repeat, reshape, or reformat signals from data terminals and controllers; telecommunications brackets, clips and clamps to house and support cable and telecommunications equipment all distributed as a unit, and also including, computer networking and other networking, telecommunications and transmission devices and telecommunications and transmission devices and equipment, such as "Wi-Fi", WLAN and MLAN equipment, as well as sensors, end points and connectivity equipment for building automated systems, as well as other products including but not limited telecommunications closets and residential distribution points, such as but not Limited to racks, cabinets, closets, power supplies and jacks used with or for cable or cord; local cords, cables, and wiring necessary to obtain electrical power from a wall outlet or to connect a single computer with a mouse, a printer, a keyboard, a monitor or a drive or CD burner | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |