USPTO serial 75373666
GR.8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GR.8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD B TURER
10384 KINGSBRIDGE RDELLICOTT CITY, MD 21042-5864UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES; PRODUCING VIDEO INFOMERCIALS; LOGO DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT OF MARKETING BROCHURES, ANNUAL REPORTS, DIRECT MARKETING PROGRAMS AND PRODUCT AND SERVICE FULFILLMENT MATERIALS; DEVELOPMENT OF SALES PRESENTATION, CD-ROMS, VIDEOS AND POINT OF SERVICE KIOSKS ALL DONE FOR OTHERS AND ALL CONTAINING ADVERTISING AND INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS AND CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; GRAPHIC ART DESIGN, PRODUCT RESEARCH AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |