USPTO serial 75373773
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sidney R.Brown
SIDNEY R BROWN JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUE3500 SUNTRUST PLZ303 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30308| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | RADIO BROADCASTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |