Drawing for CUMULUS BROADCASTING INC.

USPTO serial 75373773

CUMULUS BROADCASTING INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUMULUS BROADCASTING INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sidney R.Brown

SIDNEY R BROWN JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUE3500 SUNTRUST PLZ303 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038RADIO BROADCASTING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 24, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 22, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 22, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 12, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 11, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 11, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 5, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 26, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 28, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 16, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 31, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance