USPTO serial 75374507
E SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY A SADOWSKI
JEFFREY A SADOWSKI HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PCTHE PINEHURST OFFICE CTR STE 1011400 N WOODWARD AVEBLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-2856Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Domestic vacuum cleaners and replacement parts therefor; domestic vacuum cleaners and attachments therefor, sold as unit; domestic vacuum cleaner attachments, namely, hoses, nozzles and brushes | ACTIVE | May 23, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |