USPTO serial 75374531
AUTOCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS BAKER & MCKENZIE2 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for re-engineering and troubleshooting other software applications and manuals distributed therewith | ACTIVE | Jan 19, 2001 |
| 042 | Computer software design; maintenance and updating of computer software; computer programming services, including re-engineering and troubleshooting software applications | ACTIVE | Jan 19, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |