Drawing for BEAUTIFUL AND BENEFICIAL

USPTO serial 75374631

BEAUTIFUL AND BENEFICIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAUTIFUL AND BENEFICIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J MICHAEL CLEARY

J MICHAEL CLEARY CLEARY KOMEN & LEWIS LLP600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SE STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003make-up remover, eye liner, mascara, eye shadow, lip liner, eyebrow pencil, eye cream, eye make-up remover, lip gloss, facial masks, and non-medicated cream for the treatment of brown spots on the skin; skin care preparations, namely, skin cleansers, skin moisturizers, skin toners, age-retardant creams, lotions and gels, pore clarifying gels, skin creams and skin lotions; sun care preparations, namely, sun tanning lotions, creams and gels, sunless tanning cream, lotion, gel and spray and sun blocks; and body care preparations, namely body cleansing wash, gel and bar, body lotion, body oil, body moisturizer, dry oil spray for the body, hand cream and hand lotion, non-medicated foot cream and non-medicated foot lotion, hair and skin shampoo, and hair and skin conditionerACTIVE—
005acne treatment preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 30, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 2, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 28, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 6, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 13, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 13, 1999DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance