Drawing for FREE YOUR INFORMATION

USPTO serial 75374989

FREE YOUR INFORMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREE YOUR INFORMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

COLETTE A. DURST-BARKEY

COLLETE A DURST-BARKEY PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBERRY ET AL320 WATERGATE SIX HUNDREDWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS FOR USE IN ENTERPRISE SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION THAT PERMITS THE TRANSFER, TRANSMISSION AND INTEGRATION OF DATA, TEXT, GRAPHICS AND CODE BETWEEN DIFFERENT APPLICATION PROGRAMS, OPERATING SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PLATFORMS; PROVIDES AN INTERFACE BETWEEN COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR THE TRANSFER, TRANSMISSION AND INTEGRATION OF DATA, TEXT, GRAPHICS AND CODE; AND ENABLES THE EXPANDED USE BY TRANSMITTING APPLICATION PROGRAMS VIA INTERCONNECTED COMPUTER NETWORKS AND LOCAL NETWORKS LINKED BY COMMON PROTOCOLS; COMMUNICATION WITHIN BUSINESS ENTITIES; COMMUNICATION BETWEEN VARIOUS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ENVIRONMENTS; NETWORKING BETWEEN DIFFERENT HARDWARE SYSTEMS, APPLICATIONS, DATABASES, PROGRAMS, PROTOCOLS, PLATFORMS; INTERFACING OR INTEGRATING BETWEEN NETWORKS OF HARDWARE, OPERATING SYSTEMS AND/OR SOFTWARE; INTERFACING BETWEEN COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, DATABASES, PROGRAMS, PROTOCOLS, PLATFORMS; COMMUNICATING AND INTERFACING BETWEEN DIFFERENT COMPUTER PLATFORMS AND SYSTEMS IN LOCAL NETWORKS; ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DATABASES RECORDED ON CD-ROM, FLOPPY DISCS, BLANK MAGNETIC COMPUTER TAPES, AND MAGNETICALLY ENCODED CARDS, AND PROPRIETARY PROTOCOLS THAT ENABLES THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER APPLICATION PROGRAMS AND SOLVES DATE-RELATED PROBLEMS; AND COMPUTER UTILITY PROGRAMS FOR USE WITH THE FOREGOINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance