USPTO serial 75374989
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COLETTE A. DURST-BARKEY
COLLETE A DURST-BARKEY PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBERRY ET AL320 WATERGATE SIX HUNDREDWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS FOR USE IN ENTERPRISE SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION THAT PERMITS THE TRANSFER, TRANSMISSION AND INTEGRATION OF DATA, TEXT, GRAPHICS AND CODE BETWEEN DIFFERENT APPLICATION PROGRAMS, OPERATING SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PLATFORMS; PROVIDES AN INTERFACE BETWEEN COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR THE TRANSFER, TRANSMISSION AND INTEGRATION OF DATA, TEXT, GRAPHICS AND CODE; AND ENABLES THE EXPANDED USE BY TRANSMITTING APPLICATION PROGRAMS VIA INTERCONNECTED COMPUTER NETWORKS AND LOCAL NETWORKS LINKED BY COMMON PROTOCOLS; COMMUNICATION WITHIN BUSINESS ENTITIES; COMMUNICATION BETWEEN VARIOUS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ENVIRONMENTS; NETWORKING BETWEEN DIFFERENT HARDWARE SYSTEMS, APPLICATIONS, DATABASES, PROGRAMS, PROTOCOLS, PLATFORMS; INTERFACING OR INTEGRATING BETWEEN NETWORKS OF HARDWARE, OPERATING SYSTEMS AND/OR SOFTWARE; INTERFACING BETWEEN COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, DATABASES, PROGRAMS, PROTOCOLS, PLATFORMS; COMMUNICATING AND INTERFACING BETWEEN DIFFERENT COMPUTER PLATFORMS AND SYSTEMS IN LOCAL NETWORKS; ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DATABASES RECORDED ON CD-ROM, FLOPPY DISCS, BLANK MAGNETIC COMPUTER TAPES, AND MAGNETICALLY ENCODED CARDS, AND PROPRIETARY PROTOCOLS THAT ENABLES THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER APPLICATION PROGRAMS AND SOLVES DATE-RELATED PROBLEMS; AND COMPUTER UTILITY PROGRAMS FOR USE WITH THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |