USPTO serial 75374994
BUCKEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUCKEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VALERIE W. JOHNSON
VALERIE W JOHNSON GARRISON MORRISON & HAIGHT, PLLC5100 POPLAR AVE STE 2100MEMPHIS, TN 38137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | air-laid paper rolls for use in the manufacture of pre-moistened hot towels, baby wipes, industrial wipes, tablecloths, napkins, handkerchiefs, roll towels, diapers feminine hygiene products, adult incontinence products and liquid filtration products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |