Drawing for INFLIGHT NEWSPAPER

USPTO serial 75375159

INFLIGHT NEWSPAPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, CHERYL L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFLIGHT NEWSPAPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DOUGLAS S PULITZER

DOUGLAS S PULITZER THE PULITZER LAW FIRM378 SEA CLIFF AVE STE 1SEA CLIFF, NY 11579UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FOR MAGAZINES AND NEWSPAPERS,ACTIVEDec 31, 1968

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 11, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 27, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance