Drawing for FLOORING PLUS

USPTO serial 75379407

FLOORING PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLOORING PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHERYL N STEPHENSON

SHERYL N STEPHENSON SHAPIRO AND ORLANDER36 S CHARLES ST 20TH FLBALTIMORE, MD 21201-3147UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Cooperative advertising and marketing; Distributorships in the field of flooring materials and suppliesABANDONEDJan 15, 1997
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes in the field of sales in the retail flooring businessABANDONEDJan 15, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 1999PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 14, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance