USPTO serial 75381220
INDIAN WELLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INDIAN WELLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CATHERINE T DOYLE
CATHERINE T DOYLE DOYLE LAW3470 MT DIABLO BLVDSTE A 150LAFAYETTE, CA 94549Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND DRINKING WATER, NAMELY, CARBONATED AND NON-CARBONATED WATER, FLAVORED CARBONATED WATER, NATURAL WATER, WELL WATER, SPARKLING WATER, SPRING WATER, ARTESIAN WATER, MINERAL WATER, PURIFIED WATER, AND STILL WATER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |