USPTO serial 75388292
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
1752 Villars-sur-Glane, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN A SKINNER
1 KAISER PLZ STE 2360OAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific surveying, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking, life-saving and data transmission apparatus and instruments for measuring, checking, testing, protecting, regulating, and monitoring physical properties, namely, loads, forces, weight, displacements, pressures, temperatures, vibrations, torques, speed and ice formation) in industrial processes, in manufacturing installations, in energy production installations, in buildings, in machines and machine tools as well as in vehicles for locomotion by land, air, water or space, namely, accelerometers and piezoelectric accelerometers, ice sensors, dynamic pressure sensors, vibration velocity sensors, air gap sensors, speed sensors, proximity probes for relative vibration and displacement, speed probes, transducers for ice detection, dynamic pressure, vibration velocity, air gap and speed, ice detection systems consisting primarily of ice sensors and de-icing controllers; rotor track and balance monitors, oil debris monitors, fluid level sensors, electric chip detectors, magnetic chip collectors, load and force sensors, displacement transducers, rotary transmitters, condition monitors, signal conditioners and modular vibration signal conditioners, galvanic separators, vibration monitors, remote signal interfaces, monitors and protection monitors, controllers, computer hardware and computer programs for controlling, measuring, checking, protecting, testing and monitoring the aforementioned apparatus and instruments; and parts for all the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |