USPTO serial 75389799
WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2793368Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 2003
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHAT WOULD JESUS DO??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES A COLES
JAMES A COLES BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS2700 1ST INDIANA PLZ135 N PENNSYLVANIA STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, hats, and shirts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 27, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by What Would Jesus Do? L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by What Would Jesus Do? L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by What Would Jesus Do? L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |