Drawing for FLEXIFEEDER

USPTO serial 75397928

FLEXIFEEDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAXLEY,ANDREW P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXIFEEDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C FREDERICK KOENIG III

C FREDERICK KOENIG III VOLPE & KOENIG PC400 ONE PENN CTR1617 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVDPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machinery for delivering dry bulk materials, namely mechanical conveyors, feeders, continuous blending units, hoppers and hoppering aidsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 3, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 24, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 21, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance