USPTO serial 75412031
IMODA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELSNER, KATHLEEN KEENE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMODA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERICH W MERRILL JR
ERICH W MERRILL JR MILLER NASH WIENER HAGER & CARLSEN LLP3500 US BANCORP TWR111 SW 5TH AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204-3699Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design of world wide web pages for other use with global electronic information networks, internal information networks, and local area networks; design of computer software and database integration for others; design of printing and graphical art for others, including digital and multimedia art; consultation services related to computerized promotion, namely on-line marketing, web site promotion, and electronic commerce; consultation services related to intellectual property, namely trademark and domain name protection, corporate identity, brand identity, and digital branding; computer consultation services related to computer needs assessment, strategic planning, competitive analysis, training, and corporate development and presentation | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |