USPTO serial 75413501
MTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 24, 2002
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
M.T.H. Manifatture Tecnolegno Hartz S.r.l.
I-10040 ALMESE (TO), IT
Other trademarks owned by M.T.H. Manifatture Tecnolegno Hartz S.r.l.
M.T.H. Manifatture Tecnolegno Hartz S.r.l.
I-10040 ALMESE (TO), IT
Other trademarks owned by M.T.H. Manifatture Tecnolegno Hartz S.r.l.
M.T.H. Manifatture Tecnolegno Hartz S.r.l.
I-10040 ALMESE (TO), IT
Other trademarks owned by M.T.H. Manifatture Tecnolegno Hartz S.r.l.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD F MANDELBAUM
Howard F Mandelbaum Levine & Mandelbaum222 Bloomingdale RoadSuite 203White Plains, NY 10605Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METALLIC DOORS FOR COLD ROOMS, PANELS FOR METALLIC COLD ROOM DOORS, METALLIC DOOR FRAMES, METAL DOOR GASKETS, AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | NON-METALLIC DOORS FOR COLD ROOMS, PANELS FOR NON-METALLIC COLD ROOM DOORS, NON-METALLIC DOOR FRAMES, NON-METALLIC DOOR GASKETS, AND REPLACEMENT PARTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M.T.H. Manifatture Tecnolegno Hartz S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by M.T.H. Manifatture Tecnolegno Hartz S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by M.T.H. Manifatture Tecnolegno Hartz S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named MTH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |