USPTO serial 75414312
APTECH COMPUTER EDUCATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APTECH COMPUTER EDUCATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ANDHERI (E), BOMBAY 400 093, IN
ANDHERI (E), BOMBAY 400 093, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL D SCHUMANN
KRISTINA M FOUDRAY MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed instructional teaching materials, namely, books, magazines, and papers related to computer and information technology education; journals, brochures, pamphlets, newsletters, and leaflets related to computer and information technology education; stationery items and other printed materials, namely, catalogues, writing paper pads, letter heads, computer stationery, business cards, stickers, folders, diaries, calendars, table planners, envelopes, pens, and pencils used in relation to computer and information technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |