USPTO serial 75414696
ARTHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2000
- Examiner
- MENARD, MARLENE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARTHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSE MARTINEZ JR
JOSE MARTINEZ JR JOSE MARTINEZ, JR ESQ6TH FL66 W BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, the production and distribution of motion pictures and motion picture excerpts, production of videotapes featuring motion pictures and distribution of television programming for others; publication of books, catalogs, magazines and manuscripts pertaining to or relating to the motion industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |