USPTO serial 75429369
AEROCEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2002
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with AEROCEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHANGWAD SAMUTPRAKARN, TH
Aeroflex International Co., Ltd.
Changwad Rayong, TH
Aeroflex International Co., Ltd.
Changwad Rayong, TH
EASTERN POLYMER INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
CHANGWAD SAMUTPRAKARN, TH
Other trademarks owned by EASTERN POLYMER INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Aeroflex International Co., Ltd.
Changwad Rayong, TH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruy M. Garcia-Zamor
Ruy M. Garcia-Zamor GARCIA-ZAMOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW12960 Linden Church Rd.CLARKSVILLE, MD 21029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | RUBBER SHEETS AND TUBES FOR HEAT INSULATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AEROFLEX CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Aeroflex International Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Aeroflex International Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by EASTERN POLYMER INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Aeroflex International Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named AEROCEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 25, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |